Other than Gripen NG I don’t see a single development program of note that isn’t firmly grounded in the low observable with regard to radar camp. In February 1998 ASRAAM was selected by the Royal Australian Air Force for use on their F/A-18 Hornets following competitive evaluation of the improved ASRAAM, the Rafael Python 4 and the AIM-9X. The original intent was for four ASRAAM to be carried internally. British Aerospace and Bodensseewerk Geratetechnic (BGT) would work on an ASRAAM pre-feasibility to study to complete by the end of 1981. ASRAAM Block 6 is currently scheduled for integration with the F-35B as part of the Block IV software release. Neither are as yet certain. ” I don’t see that it’s going to be super-duper fast, because you can’t outrun missiles // It has to have an ability to carry a payload such that it can deploy a spectrum of weapons. I did not try to correct this for two reasons – one there aren´t even any provisional figures available for the later, but also because I wanted to show that even the APA´s worst case scenario does not suggest that the F-35-SPEAR 3 combo will be ineffective. HMAF, they use both I think, ASRAAM on Hornet and AIM-9X on Super Hornet. Asraam is a rail launched weapon not applicable to internal bay. One would presume an order of magnitude increase in the ASRAAM effectiveness. The USN will be in a position were it may have to plan to defend against a stealth equipped opponent without the tools to counter it as the SPY-6 equipped Flight III Arleigh Burke’s will not be inservice by the time the J-20 squadron(s) are combat ready. As PE said, I’m sure this is a lot of what weapons integration is about and is probably one of the reasons it is so costly and time-consuming. It became clear that there were two basic issues causing the problem. ASRAAM can also be fired at very high speeds and G loading, locking on to the target before or after launch. British pilots achieved an 80% kill ratio with the L model during the Falklands War, a number matched by the Israeli Air Force a few months later over the Bekaa Valley. Only the CSP version. On the plus side, IF it works, it frees up the internal bays for other ordnance. Raytheon claims the current TPY-2 THAAD radar using the ‘old generation’ GaAs “…track a home run from a ball park from several hundred miles away.”If we take several hundred to mean three hundred, then this range is about 480 km. https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/uk-orders-advanced-asraam-weapons-for-f-35b-428544/. Isnt meteor this primary A2A weapon for the F35? If something moves fast through the air and disrupts molecules in the air and puts out heat – I don’t care how cool the engine can be – it’s going to be detectable”. Thus, a notional twenty-microsecond compressed pulse with a range resolution of 150 feet should have the range resolution to get the warhead close enough—according to Pietrucha’s theory. I’m actually more curious about how the internal bays work when the aircraft is tilted at odd angles! Blk 4.1 & 4.2 hoped to be confirmed later this year, Blk 4.3 & 4.4 are wish lists. Could you expand on the Vympel findings please? A two-year definition contract was awarded to BBG in 1985, by then, US-Europe defence industrial relations were cooling. The battlefield is never “clean”. They only calculated the RCS figures for the f-35 from angles of 45 degrees or more off the aircraft´s nose. This was the world’s first thrust vectoring missile and included a novel air carriage system using a low drag canister, rather than free suspension of the missile on a pylon. This latest variant of ASRAAM missile will enter service on Typhoon in 2018 and F-35 in 2022, when the existing variant will be taken out of service. The overall ASRAAM programme, combined with associated workload around domestic and export programmes using the core CAMM system, is employing 400 skilled employees across the MBDA sites and the UK complex weapons supply chain. One would hope but no signs that the MoD would be funding a GaN update of the Type 997 Artisan 3D radar. Understanding is it was more manoeuvrable than anticipated, is this correct? Various reasons are often cited including the ending of the Cold War and full realisation of the capabilities of the Russian R-73 missile, but many commentators think this was a smokescreen for financial and defence industrial share issues. There was going to be a little swing that dropped down to let the missile clear the bay, but it was dropped in favor of a low observable external pylon, which has yet to leave the drawing board I believe. , In September 2015, the UK's MOD signed a £300 million contract for a new and improved version of the ASRAAM that would leverage new technological developments, including those from the CAMM missile. As F-35 comes into wide service I expect to see weapons change pretty drastically to suit it. USN Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Jonathan Greenert speaking about the Navy’s next generation air dominance F/A-XX fighter at the at the Naval Future Force Science and Technology Expo, Feb. 2015, some quotes. It is cylindrical and has a domed nose. The real interest is in the avionics, but that’s something that’s not easy to model and is kept rather more hush-hush than what the thing looks like. in May 2014 SAAB launched five new AESA GaN radars to update Giraffe and Arthur models. The result was a direct hit on the target. Everything is a balance, this is a LO / payload trade off. AMRAAM is ejected under force into the free stream. The £300 million contract was placed in 2015, with initial deliveries to take place in 2016. He would have had access to all the classified info. Parts of the missile have been used in the Common Anti-aircraft Modular Missile. Various reasons are often cited such as the ending of the Cold War and full realisation of the capabilities of the Russian R-73 missile, but many think this was a smokescreen for issues of finance and defence industrial share. @NE The likes of APA are obsessed with LO, when it’s not even the most important thing that the F-35 brings to the party. So “stealth” planes are always detectable. ASRAAM is in service with the Royal Air Force as its Within Visual Range (WVR) Dominance weapon. The P3I would have been very much like the AIM-132, but with the addition of thrust vectoring to provide increased agility and to carry a larger warhead to meet the requirements expressed by the AIM-9X program. The missile rail is canted out to make it clear the aircraft properly. There is insufficient space internal in the weapons bays to be true high end multirole. If asraam was to be internally carried it would of been carried were the bomb goes so it became pointless. , In a series of tests in the mid-1970s, the USAF found that their existing AIM-7 Sparrow missile had an effective range against fighter targets no better than the ostensibly much shorter-range Sidewinder. Wasn’t the idea for F35 to at some point to have rail-launched missiles, like ASRAAM, internally mounted on the bay doors themselves? The thinking behind IR missiles goes back to the 50’s and 60’s really. Tactics and flight profiles and knowing where the enemy is, will be critical too. The range is stated to be ‘in excess of 25km’ and variously reported to be around 50km. Because it looks cool? It is hoped for Blk 4.1 to start development as follow on to Blk 3.6 in 2018 and go live in 2020 with following updates at two yearly intervals, Blk 4.2 – 2022, Blk 4.3 – 2024 & Blk 4.4 – 2026. http://cfile4.uf.tistory.com/image/2319183B55AF9CD509DE8A. It retains a 50 g manoeuvrability provided by body lift technology coupled with tail control.. Air to surface potential would also be considered. All was going relatively well until the 1974 Defence White Paper that saw significant budget reductions. Any future aircraft is likely to incorporate LO features, because why give your opponent a free ride? , The rapid decline and eventual fall of the Soviet Union in the late 1980s led to considerably less interest in the ASRAAM effort. @Mark You can rail launch from an internal bay, the F-22 does that with the AIM9. Already fully integrated with proven reliability on Typhoon, Tornado and F/A-18, ASRAAM is also being integrated onto the F-35 Lightning II. ASRAAM has a single blast fragmentation warhead detonated by impact and laser proximity fuze. Firstly the AARGM-ER, Advanced Anti-Radiation Guided Missile Extended Range with $267 million in development funding 2016-20 with current guidance system and warhead of the AGM-88E with a new motor to counter the newer longer range land based AAMs. had no faith in the common perception of the effectiveness in LO/stealth a/c and was totally underwhelmed by it in light of the new paradigm in radar,IR, computers and AI. That means that these radars couldn´t be reliably used to guide a missile all the way to the target, and would therefore need missiles with their own seekers to complete the intercept. US experience with the Sidewinder since then has been mixed, with a percentage kill of just under 60% for the F-15, but almost zero for F-16s and F/A-18s, including a notable miss in 2017 when a 1970s-era Syrian Su-22 "Fitter" defeated a modern AIM-9X launched by a US Navy F/A-18. Plans for integration with Sea Harrier and Tornado ADV were also dropped. The programme was also now to be led by BAE. This variant would replace the current one when it goes out of service in 2022. The US assigned this missile the name AIM-132 ASRAAM. ASRAAM was expected to enter service by 1990, naturally, US industry was not happy at this turn of events, despite the cessation of European development on medium range air to air missiles to the obvious advantage of AMRAAM. Engineers and scientists write these claims, operators just laugh as we automatically factor in the less than perfect conditions, inevitability less than perfect performance, combat conditions and the Murphy factor. This, combined with the F-35s stealthiness in the X and Ku-bands (those used by the seekers in missiles), makes successfully prosecuting an engagement against an F-35 much more difficult than successfully prosecuting one against against a 4th-gen aircraft, even if both are easily detected by VHF and HF-band radars.